View Single Post
Old 10-26-2013, 10:59 PM   #86
speakingtohe
Wizard
speakingtohe ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.speakingtohe ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.speakingtohe ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.speakingtohe ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.speakingtohe ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.speakingtohe ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.speakingtohe ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.speakingtohe ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.speakingtohe ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.speakingtohe ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.speakingtohe ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Posts: 4,812
Karma: 26912940
Join Date: Apr 2010
Device: sony PRS-T1 and T3, Kobo Mini and Aura HD, Tablet
Quote:
Originally Posted by Catlady View Post
I have no problem in principle with anyone wanting to adapt Austen for a movie or a musical or a TV series. I might be skeptical, but we'd all know from the get-go that the adaptation is necessarily going to be a different experience. There's something that just rankles about rewriting the books with the same titles; yes, I consider the titles a major sticking point. It creates confusion for the reader, and I don't understand why anyone would want to confuse the reader this way. It just feels wrong.
I can see your point. But as this is a commissioned project, I doubt the authors have a choice if they want to get paid. It should say what it is on the cover, but I can't feel myself that actual harm is being done.

Helen
speakingtohe is offline   Reply With Quote