View Single Post
Old 10-24-2013, 08:49 AM   #73
PatNY
Zennist
PatNY ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.PatNY ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.PatNY ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.PatNY ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.PatNY ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.PatNY ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.PatNY ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.PatNY ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.PatNY ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.PatNY ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.PatNY ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
PatNY's Avatar
 
Posts: 1,022
Karma: 47809468
Join Date: Jul 2010
Device: iPod Touch, Sony PRS-350, Nook HD+ & HD
Quote:
Originally Posted by jbjb View Post
We've gone from (paraphrasing) "lack of *any* scalability is *currently* restricting Apple, and *always* has" to "lack of *easy* scalability *was* restricting Apple, but isn't any more".

You may think the difference is insignificant, but I disagree. The first claim is demonstrably factually incorrect, while the second is at least arguable. Personally, I find that factual incorrectness weakens an argument! :-)

/JB
The argument still stands. It is a fact that prior to iOS6, which includes the bulk of the history of iOS, Apple was restricted by its own software architecture from introducing additional screen sizes.

You have to nitpick in order to find fault with my argument. That's fine with me.

--Pat
PatNY is offline   Reply With Quote