View Single Post
Old 10-19-2013, 07:41 AM   #8
Tex2002ans
Wizard
Tex2002ans ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Tex2002ans ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Tex2002ans ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Tex2002ans ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Tex2002ans ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Tex2002ans ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Tex2002ans ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Tex2002ans ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Tex2002ans ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Tex2002ans ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Tex2002ans ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Posts: 2,306
Karma: 13057279
Join Date: Jul 2012
Device: Kobo Forma, Nook
Quote:
Originally Posted by zekton View Post
I thought the book did it this way but when I checked back it had the wedge and the word highlighted and linked together and it looks OK. So that's probably best.
Typically, it is recommended to just surround the number/symbol with brackets.

So a "^" back link will turn into a "[^]" or a "1" will turn into a "[1]" or "a" will turn into "[a]".

It is much easier to touch 3+ characters than 1 (ESPECIALLY WHEN THEY ARE SUPERSCRIPT).

All the books that I convert now for work, we decided to settle on using the a non-superscript [##] format. This allows for:
  • Easy touch/click
  • No line-height problems
  • Easier for the visually impaired to read
    • Users who read at an extremely large font size for sight reasons will not be able to read the superscript footnote as clearly.

The bracketed + non-superscript footnotes do look a little unsightly, but I believe the advantages outweigh the costs.

With more and more devices going towards touch, and more and more reading digital content, this will only help.

Last edited by Tex2002ans; 10-19-2013 at 07:46 AM.
Tex2002ans is offline   Reply With Quote