View Single Post
Old 10-04-2008, 09:14 AM   #37
TallMomof2
Kindlephilia
TallMomof2 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.TallMomof2 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.TallMomof2 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.TallMomof2 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.TallMomof2 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.TallMomof2 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.TallMomof2 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.TallMomof2 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.TallMomof2 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.TallMomof2 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.TallMomof2 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
TallMomof2's Avatar
 
Posts: 2,017
Karma: 1139255
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Snowpacolypse 2010
Device: Too many to count
Quote:
Originally Posted by axel77 View Post
Sorry but why does the size of a company have to do anything with profitably requires? If you can estimate an investment of X to have say 20% profit on investment return, its good, big company or startup company.

One can point out that bigger companies don't worry about smaller X, that is smaller oppurtinieties to make out of not so much money +20%. Because they got more paperwork to do, as when a smaller company takes an opportunity of smaller volume. But the profit margin itself it really IMHO does not matter how big the company is.

Not that I would like any hint of readers to be fruitfull markets and not that I actually believe they are. But this argument above presented here as "main argument" is IMHO just a logic fallacy.
DH used to work for a huge networking company for a total of 13 years. 71% was the required profit margin for a new product. Anything less and the product was not launched. I realize that Sony may not require such astronomical return on investment but I'm sure it is substantial.
TallMomof2 is offline   Reply With Quote