Thread: Naming the baby
View Single Post
Old 10-04-2013, 01:20 PM   #11
knc1
Going Viral
knc1 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.knc1 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.knc1 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.knc1 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.knc1 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.knc1 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.knc1 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.knc1 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.knc1 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.knc1 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.knc1 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
knc1's Avatar
 
Posts: 17,212
Karma: 18210809
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Central Texas
Device: No K1, PW2, KV, KOA
Quote:
Originally Posted by ixtab View Post
PW2. Or actually "K5-PW2". Then we could also ask to have "K5-PW" (or "K5-PW1") and "K5-Touch" (or "K5-T") as labels for those particular devices.

K6 would be a horrible choice IMO, because the device is *not* a K6 in any way. We regularly have that confusion when people speak of "K4 Touch" or "K5 non-touch". And it usually takes at least a couple of posts to even find out which device people are really talking about.

Using the FW major version as labels - possibly with finer-grained "specialization" - is the only sensible option IMO.
Well made argument.

K5-PW1, K5-PW2, K5-Touch
Would be a good, over-all, improvement.

I hate to think of the prefix renaming chore that would present, but then I am not a moderator.
knc1 is offline   Reply With Quote