View Single Post
Old 10-03-2008, 01:29 PM   #179
NatCh
Gizmologist
NatCh ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.NatCh ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.NatCh ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.NatCh ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.NatCh ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.NatCh ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.NatCh ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.NatCh ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.NatCh ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.NatCh ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.NatCh ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
NatCh's Avatar
 
Posts: 11,615
Karma: 929550
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Republic of Texas Embassy at Jackson, TN
Device: Pocketbook Touch HD3
Quote:
Originally Posted by pilotbob View Post
I think the smallest hard drive version of the iPod has always been around $250. Each release they bump up the capacity and features of that base (now classic) model. For example, I have a gen 4 which has a 20gb drive and monochrome screen that cost me $250. The new gen 6 iPod classic now has a 120GB drive, a color screen that plays movies and games.
Okay, my numbers are a bit off. Still that sounds a fair amount like what Sony's doing with their prices -- the newest model is the price of the old one when it was new.

I also feel it should be noted that Sony has no control over the cost of the most expensive component in these devices: the display. That's PVI's call.

Loss-leading is a strategy that works well in some markets and not in others. Books are rather a smaller industry than video games, and Sony isn't really even trying locking us into their bookstore -- the multiple formats and the new epub support are evidence of that. Even Amazon's Kindle, the single most locked down reading device available, isn't loss-leading, and Amazon knows quite a bit about the subject ... how many years did they operate before they first showed a profit?

I guess what I'm saying is: pineapples to kumquats.
NatCh is offline   Reply With Quote