Quote:
Originally Posted by MelBr
That's not how employment law works. Plus your current employer would probably not fire you because of an arrest. Suing over employment/dismissal is extremely hard and a giant waste of your time and life. And in the end, you'd probably end up with a huge bill regardless of the outcome.
|
OK, I stand corrected. My apologies. Don't sue that employer because it's not worth the aggravation.
Quote:
Originally Posted by MelBr
As for the miscategorization issue, again, you cannot classify something based on the lack of evidence. That's not how most ML algos work. If you want to get classified and put into various databases, do some Google searches on various subjects of dangerous materials, their procurement, processing and use.  That's going to raise some flags for sure. Oh, and browse Islamic fundamentalist forums. … |
OK, re ML, I assume security agencies also use other additional means of gathering intelligence. Elementary logic: the lack of current proof does not mean you did not do it or intend to do it soon. It is a myth to say you are innocent until proven guilty. Again I make an assumption about attitude: in security/intelligence circles everyone is guilty until "probably-proven" innocent, and even then you'd better keep a close eye on them. By analogy, the competent bodyguard to a VIP automatically assumes everyone in the vicinity is armed and lethal and constantly evaluates potential risks. The lack of apparent gun doesn't mean there is not a lethally dosed nearly invisible needle attached to someone's finger. No gun does not equal no intent to harm. No evidence does not indicate no intent to harm. So it makes sense to constantly evaluate all possible indicators, including subtle or unconscious ones, or even technically astute network-savvy ones.