View Single Post
Old 09-24-2013, 06:46 PM   #23
jbjb
Somewhat clueless
jbjb ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.jbjb ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.jbjb ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.jbjb ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.jbjb ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.jbjb ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.jbjb ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.jbjb ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.jbjb ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.jbjb ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.jbjb ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Posts: 771
Karma: 9545975
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: UK
Device: Kindle Oasis
Quote:
Originally Posted by MovieBird View Post
I think you need to brush up on what the AIAA is, and those who pay attention to their publications
You misunderstand me - my whole point is that it should be left to organisations such as the AIAA /FAA etc to make these decisions. I have no objection at all if expert bodies choose to allow electronic device use after proper consideration - in fact I'd be delighted.

My disagreement comes when Joe Public asserts that they should be allowed because, for example, they "left their phone on once and didn't die so it must be OK".

Previous threads on this subject have been full of opinion asserted as fact from people with absolutely no expertise or understanding on which to base their opinions. My beef isn't with the conclusion, it's with the reasoning.

My reference to those with no education or experience in this matter was aimed at the unqualified public who seem to feel their gut feel has some validity, and not at any professional bodies and specifically not at the report quoted in the original post.

/JB

Last edited by jbjb; 09-24-2013 at 06:50 PM.
jbjb is offline   Reply With Quote