View Single Post
Old 09-24-2013, 03:45 PM   #18
MovieBird
TuxSlash
MovieBird ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.MovieBird ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.MovieBird ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.MovieBird ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.MovieBird ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.MovieBird ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.MovieBird ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.MovieBird ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.MovieBird ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.MovieBird ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.MovieBird ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
MovieBird's Avatar
 
Posts: 392
Karma: 2436547
Join Date: Oct 2009
Device: GlowNook
Quote:
Originally Posted by jbjb View Post
Some, on the other hand, have felt that any changes in the rules should be based on science, research and the understanding of experts in the field, and that the opinion of those with no relevant education or experience is of little value.

/JB
I think you need to brush up on what the AIAA is, and those who pay attention to their publications

Quote:
Originally Posted by auspex View Post
Seems backward to me. The rules were implemented without valid reason or adequate study, simply because somebody thought there was a minor possibility that something could happen. So anecdote and uneducated opinion were enough to create bureaucracy, but not to remove it.
Precisely. I don't feel like looking for it now, but I've previously posted links to reports showing that even though the aircraft manufacturers take this very seriously, they've not been able to reliably reproduce electrical interference from consumer electronics.

Or you could just read through the several 20+ page threads we've already had on this.
MovieBird is offline   Reply With Quote