Quote:
Originally Posted by Terisa de morgan
The first point is not a guideline, but saying: "We inspect any shelf we like and we decide". The second point is mind reading: How are they sure the shelf has been used with that point in mind?
That's what I said and Goodreads's appologies? We have an Spanish said that I think goes to the point now: "Perdona pero aguanta". Sorry but you keep the pain (they can't undelete...)
|
More than likely they check the name of the shelf first. I am sure that is what brought it to their attention then if they are unsure they check the content. This seems logical to me. It doesn't need to be a guideline it's a method they used and they reveal it which I wouldn't have because then people can find a work around it.
I don't want them to undelete most of those shelves were mean and hateful. The worst of the worst. I don't think they should have apologized just said they would notify users from now on to give them time. They have gone beyond what is expecting of any site of this type. Does Facebook notify you before they delete your photos? No they removed it then give a warning. Three warnings and you're are banned. Goodreads is being way nicer to it's users. Facebook changes its guidelines all the time without letting anyone know till its done or some news media picks it up.