View Single Post
Old 09-24-2013, 01:32 AM   #128
library addict
Grand Sorcerer
library addict ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.library addict ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.library addict ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.library addict ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.library addict ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.library addict ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.library addict ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.library addict ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.library addict ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.library addict ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.library addict ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
library addict's Avatar
 
Posts: 13,124
Karma: 37197878
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: USA
Device: Nexus 7 2, Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8" (retired=Sony PRS650, Kobo Mini)
I agree something needed to be done. And some of the shelf names were horrible. I think Goodreads does have a responsibilty to set rules and not tolerate bullying from readers or authors.

But I think there are times when an author's behavior is something I would want to know about before I purchased their books. The line is different for everyone, but for me if an author is a plagiarist I wouldn't buy any of their books. And plagiarism doesn't seem to prevent authors from future publishing contracts (i.e. Janet Dailey) so it is an on going issue. I would also want to know if an author harasses reviewers and posts their personal data online. Sadly, I've read about more than one author doing this.

I concede that Goodreads shelves may not the best place for that information, but Goodreads reviews do turn up near the top of many Google searches and were a way for readers unfamiliar with past kerfuffles to become aware of them.
library addict is offline   Reply With Quote