View Single Post
Old 09-23-2013, 08:15 AM   #77
Sil_liS
Wizard
Sil_liS ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Sil_liS ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Sil_liS ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Sil_liS ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Sil_liS ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Sil_liS ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Sil_liS ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Sil_liS ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Sil_liS ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Sil_liS ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Sil_liS ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Posts: 4,896
Karma: 33602910
Join Date: Oct 2010
Device: PocketBook 903 & 360+
Quote:
Originally Posted by caleb72 View Post
I can very easily because I'm talking about behaviour, not rules. Are you suggesting that author's behaviour on Goodreads is actually moderated differently from anybody else? If so, in policy or in practice?
I'm saying that you don't have equivalence.

On GR reviewers are the content creators, not the authors. Reviews will be deleted, book titles won't disappear from the site.

I'll try to make an analogy, and yes, I know that it isn't perfect. Imagine that one day Amazon would decide that books which are focused on the personal lives of real people count as harassment and would proceed to remove these books on a Friday after an announcement to that effect. And imagine that this change in policy would be the result of real people harassing authors followed by books being written on that harassment.
Sil_liS is offline   Reply With Quote