View Single Post
Old 09-18-2013, 02:55 PM   #122
pl001
Evangelist
pl001 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.pl001 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.pl001 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.pl001 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.pl001 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.pl001 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.pl001 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.pl001 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.pl001 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.pl001 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.pl001 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Posts: 459
Karma: 4818038
Join Date: Dec 2010
Device: Nook, Nook Color, EVO3D, Surface RT, Galaxy S5, Surface 3
Quote:
Originally Posted by WillAdams View Post
The issue is the creation of a unique biometric file which can then be used to identify a person w/o their knowledge / intent. I'm fine w/ fingerprint records being made w/ reasonable controls for their secure storage and attendant controls on privacy --- my concern is that there are no such controls in place as-of-yet.
Apple has already stated how these files are stored. It's encrypted file stored on the processor. If somebody did actually manage to get that encrypted data there is virtually nothing at all they could do with it. And the scanner isn't made available to 3rd party applications.

In all reality this means your fingerprint is far more secure in the phone than pretty much any other place it may reside.

But if you're still worried, tubemonkey appears to have a solution.

Last edited by pl001; 09-18-2013 at 02:58 PM.
pl001 is offline   Reply With Quote