View Single Post
Old 09-15-2013, 10:46 AM   #20
PatNY
Zennist
PatNY ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.PatNY ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.PatNY ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.PatNY ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.PatNY ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.PatNY ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.PatNY ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.PatNY ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.PatNY ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.PatNY ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.PatNY ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
PatNY's Avatar
 
Posts: 1,022
Karma: 47809468
Join Date: Jul 2010
Device: iPod Touch, Sony PRS-350, Nook HD+ & HD
Jackie -- Yes, when the jpeg image ends up looking a lot worse, it is usually due to compression artifacts.

In the case of Calibre, I never had an issue with compression artifacts because I import book covers differently -- through the "Browse" button in the metadata editor window. Calibre won't resample your images if you do it that way -- so long as the image's resolution (pixel dimensions) doesn't exceed what is set in Calibre. You can tweak this threshold too. I have mine set to really really large so Calibre will never resize/resample my cover images.

In the case of CC, it think the compression is done to optimize import times and database size. Personally, I would be willing to sacrifice both as I have plenty of storage room and normally only import books a couple at a time. But I understand if Charles doesn't want to go in that direction. I was just wondering if maybe there was another way to get around it.

--Pat

Last edited by PatNY; 09-15-2013 at 10:50 AM.
PatNY is offline   Reply With Quote