View Single Post
Old 09-14-2013, 02:24 PM   #4
chaley
Grand Sorcerer
chaley ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.chaley ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.chaley ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.chaley ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.chaley ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.chaley ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.chaley ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.chaley ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.chaley ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.chaley ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.chaley ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Posts: 12,461
Karma: 8025600
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Notts, England
Device: Kobo Libra 2
Quote:
Originally Posted by calvin-c View Post
Thanks greatly! I was way off on the wrong track-and I even understand the program except for the reason for the last line. I assume that's an error trap in case I stupidly enter a rating higher than 10? (I haven't found a way to limit the input in an integer column but don't consider that critical since I'm the only one that'll be using this.)
Yes, that is an error checker. It doesn't check for negative numbers. I was lazy.
Quote:
Also, is there a limit to the length of an argument? I noticed you broke the list up into 3 sections & then concatenated them. Was that just for readability? I'll probably reduce the length of some of the items (e.g. 'Unfinished' rather than 'so bad I couldn't finish it') when I actually implement this. Thanks again.
No, no limit. In fact it would run faster if you put the entire list on one line.
chaley is offline   Reply With Quote