View Single Post
Old 09-12-2013, 09:28 PM   #63
Fluribus
Guru
Fluribus ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Fluribus ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Fluribus ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Fluribus ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Fluribus ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Fluribus ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Fluribus ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Fluribus ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Fluribus ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Fluribus ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Fluribus ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Fluribus's Avatar
 
Posts: 891
Karma: 8893661
Join Date: Feb 2012
Device: Kindle
Quote:
Originally Posted by theducks View Post
I am in your camp

When you make a deliberate RECORD (use) of the conversation (in the USA), you need at least:
1) a court wiretap order
2) permission of BOTH parties
Unless there's been a change that I didn't see, this isn't universally true in the US. In some places, last time I looked, only one party of the conversation needed know that it was being recorded. As far as I recall, it only applied to audio recording. I've never heard of a law that would prevent me from acting as an undercover stenographer.
Fluribus is offline   Reply With Quote