Quote:
Originally Posted by TGS
So the seller has acted properly in that they have have good reason to believe that you are eligible to buy. But if you have set out to deliberately deceive the seller as to your eligibility, and therefore induced them to sell to you in breach of their own agreements with their suppliers, can you be said to have acted equally properly?
|
I would argue that, yes I handle properly. As far as I know there are neither laws nor moral objections against using VPN. Heck, my employer even obliges my to use VPN for any professional activities.
I have bank accounts with associated credit cards in four different countries. It makes traveling easier and spreads financial risk. Why would living in some place restrict me in the use of those credit cards?
Let's face it, both economies and societies have gone global, companies, people and especially products move around constantly. No reason why companies and the elites should profit of globalization and Joe Sixpack not. I for sure wouldn't have any moral qualms with regards to avoiding georestrictions.
However, as I mentioned earlier in this tread, the time spend to set up accounts in other countries (both bank and VPN) is in my opinion not worth the time to save a couple of bucks -- I rather spend that time defending the practice here on MR
