View Single Post
Old 09-29-2008, 09:45 AM   #107
=X=
Wizard
=X= ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.=X= ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.=X= ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.=X= ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.=X= ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.=X= ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.=X= ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.=X= ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.=X= ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.=X= ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.=X= ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
=X='s Avatar
 
Posts: 3,671
Karma: 12205348
Join Date: Mar 2008
Device: Galaxy S, Nook w/CM7
Quote:
Originally Posted by nrapallo View Post
OK, don't mind me butting in ( it IS my thread ),
Well considering it was a productive meddling you're excused

Okay I've taken a look at the files, here's the good, the bad.

There is a definite improvement on these files over what 1.8 produces today. They show up much clearer on the reader. There where two files that looked better than the rest. On was the first file minifilter-3 and the other was minifilter-5-400


What I see in PDFReader is a truncation of fonts on the top or bottom part. The best example is on Pg 6 of the landscape. However this occurs through out the text.
Some of the pixels on the font are getting erased, by dropping the dilation you overcome this but it bleeds over. I think if you stretch the page out the bleeding will be reduced

PDFLRF still looks better but again it is maximizing the screen by croping off the white spaces. I do notice PDFLRF does bleed seen mostly with the "a" font. I suspect if you dilate with a value of 300 and stretch the screen you should get similar results to that of PDFLRF.

=X=

Last edited by =X=; 09-29-2008 at 09:45 AM. Reason: fixed typo
=X= is offline   Reply With Quote