Quote:
Originally Posted by Salgueiros
Of course you can. A bad ereader with light is not a match for a good ereader without one and i am not saying such and such are good or bad, just stating that there are more specs that are important to a user than front light, and using just that parameter to judge the quality and suitability of a ereader is reductive.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sil_liS
Just like a lit screen is a moot point to many people, and it certainly is to Sony.
But if people feel that the price of the device should reflect the specs, then they should consider all the specs.
|
The thing that is generally being missed in all this discussion is that while the points being made (on both sides) are quite applicable to the people reading these forums BUT the people reading this forum represent a small (and likely tiny) portion of the e-reader buying public. While you and I may know what we want/like in an e-reader, probably the majority of buyers don't (at least on anything more than a superficial level). These devices are sold/marketed for mass consumption so you need to look at if from the perspective of a buyer who probably doesn't know or care about a lot of the features that we love or hate. If you look at it from that perspective, a reader with a light that costs the same/similar or less is automatically going to come across as a better deal to to the AVERAGE buyer (not necessarily the case to a more educated buyer) because they are getting another very obvious feature. Again I say this is what the AVERAGE buyer (who likely make up the majority of buyers) perceive. Yes there is a market for a reader specifically without a light and a reader with buttons, but the reality is that those more niche markets and I doubt you can make successful business case for them as a mass market reader. Alas, the same can be said for the possible large (13"?) reader that Sony is developing. I'd love to have one, but it's likely going to be really expensive because it likely doesn't have broad market appeal.