View Single Post
Old 09-05-2013, 09:10 PM   #93
AnemicOak
Bookaholic
AnemicOak ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.AnemicOak ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.AnemicOak ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.AnemicOak ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.AnemicOak ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.AnemicOak ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.AnemicOak ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.AnemicOak ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.AnemicOak ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.AnemicOak ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.AnemicOak ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
AnemicOak's Avatar
 
Posts: 14,391
Karma: 54969924
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Minnesota
Device: iPad Mini 4, AuraHD, iPhone XR +
Quote:
Originally Posted by SteveEisenberg View Post
Simon and Schuster could have idiots for executives, but, more likely, is making a research-based business decision concerning cannibalization.
The last thing I read, which was admittedly quite a while ago, had S&S and Macmillan wanting a system where they get paid each time a book is loaned. I believe both have dipped there toes into the current systems to at least try then out since then, but that may still be their stance. It may not necessarily be an unreasonable stance altogether, but with libraries having relatively fixed annual budgets it might be hard for them to manage.
AnemicOak is offline   Reply With Quote