View Single Post
Old 09-01-2013, 01:03 AM   #63
Sil_liS
Wizard
Sil_liS ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Sil_liS ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Sil_liS ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Sil_liS ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Sil_liS ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Sil_liS ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Sil_liS ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Sil_liS ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Sil_liS ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Sil_liS ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Sil_liS ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Posts: 4,896
Karma: 33602910
Join Date: Oct 2010
Device: PocketBook 903 & 360+
Quote:
Originally Posted by speakingtohe View Post
Separate post as I am not sure what you are saying here. Do you mean that because the content creator makes less money they will pay lower taxes. AFAIK they pay the same taxes on the money they have already received, so how is not paying taxes on money they don't have beneficial to them. If they make more money they may pay at a higher rate than on the previously earned income, but only pay the higher rate on the extra income in most places. I can't see not paying for example, an extra $40 per $100 and keeping $0 as better than paying and keeping the $60.

Helen
I was saying that if the money that money that is collected doesn't go directly to the content creators, maybe it does go to them as some kind of benefit. I don't know how much content creators pay in taxes.
Sil_liS is offline   Reply With Quote