View Single Post
Old 08-31-2013, 08:22 PM   #61
speakingtohe
Wizard
speakingtohe ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.speakingtohe ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.speakingtohe ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.speakingtohe ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.speakingtohe ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.speakingtohe ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.speakingtohe ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.speakingtohe ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.speakingtohe ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.speakingtohe ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.speakingtohe ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Posts: 4,812
Karma: 26912940
Join Date: Apr 2010
Device: sony PRS-T1 and T3, Kobo Mini and Aura HD, Tablet
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sil_liS View Post
I don't know if these money get to the content creator somehow (if not directly, then maybe indirectly through lower taxes) but the consumers are paying something.
Separate post as I am not sure what you are saying here. Do you mean that because the content creator makes less money they will pay lower taxes. AFAIK they pay the same taxes on the money they have already received, so how is not paying taxes on money they don't have beneficial to them. If they make more money they may pay at a higher rate than on the previously earned income, but only pay the higher rate on the extra income in most places. I can't see not paying for example, an extra $40 per $100 and keeping $0 as better than paying and keeping the $60.

Helen
speakingtohe is offline   Reply With Quote