View Single Post
Old 08-27-2013, 04:37 PM   #47
ectoplasm
Addict
ectoplasm ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.ectoplasm ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.ectoplasm ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.ectoplasm ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.ectoplasm ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.ectoplasm ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.ectoplasm ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.ectoplasm ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.ectoplasm ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.ectoplasm ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.ectoplasm ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Posts: 255
Karma: 1151364
Join Date: Aug 2009
Device: Aura HD and H2O
Quote:
Originally Posted by pilotbob View Post
While Ballmer was CEO, Microsoft grew revenue by $55B. Dell grew by $31B, Oracle by $27B, Intel by $19B, IBM by $16B.

BOb
I don't get the point of this type of comment that I see from time to time. It's not a question of whether Microsoft has managed to stay afloat, or make XX dollars in revenue, the question is whether a better CEO would have made a difference in comparison to Ballmer? Apparently the board thinks so, and I agree. Ballmer is not in the same league as the top tier, like Musk, Bezos, etc. Ballmer is a shouting, sweaty, salesman. That might have worked in the 70s and 80s, but not anymore.
ectoplasm is offline   Reply With Quote