View Single Post
Old 08-27-2013, 02:21 PM   #31
HarryT
eBook Enthusiast
HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
HarryT's Avatar
 
Posts: 85,557
Karma: 93980341
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: UK
Device: Kindle Oasis 2, iPad Pro 10.5", iPhone 6
Quote:
Originally Posted by Elfwreck View Post
Since Lenz v Universal, it's been established that copyright holders are legally required to consider fair use before issuing a DMCA takedown notice. Issuing one without that does indeed make for a "bogus" takedown--one not based on application law, but on the premise that a host will take down the content regardless of the validity of the notice.
I don't know what evidence you have to suggest that the copyright holder did not consider the question of fair use, and reach the conclusion that it was not fair use. Whether or not use of the tune constitutes fair use is the whole question under debate, so clearly opinions on the matter differ.
HarryT is offline   Reply With Quote