View Single Post
Old 03-07-2006, 07:38 PM   #4
rlauzon
Wizard
rlauzon put the bomp in the bomp-a-bomp-a-bomp.rlauzon put the bomp in the bomp-a-bomp-a-bomp.rlauzon put the bomp in the bomp-a-bomp-a-bomp.rlauzon put the bomp in the bomp-a-bomp-a-bomp.rlauzon put the bomp in the bomp-a-bomp-a-bomp.rlauzon put the bomp in the bomp-a-bomp-a-bomp.rlauzon put the bomp in the bomp-a-bomp-a-bomp.rlauzon put the bomp in the bomp-a-bomp-a-bomp.rlauzon put the bomp in the bomp-a-bomp-a-bomp.rlauzon put the bomp in the bomp-a-bomp-a-bomp.rlauzon put the bomp in the bomp-a-bomp-a-bomp.
 
rlauzon's Avatar
 
Posts: 1,018
Karma: 67827
Join Date: Jan 2005
Device: PocketBook Era
Quote:
Originally Posted by Antoine of MMM
Oh, I have read that battery life would be in the area of 3hrs for the first version. If it is 3hrs with wifi and BT on, then they have a heck of a sell. If not, then its no better than my 3 year old TC1000 that runs at 1GHZ with a transmeta processor and has a larger screen.
Hmmm... All the drawbacks of a laptop with fewer benefits of a laptop. That pretty much sums up tablet PCs in general so far.

I can see a niche groups who would really benefit from a tablet, but I don't see the value of a tablet for most people. For the price of a tablet, I can get a Sharp MM20 with WiFi and better battery life. Not a good value, IHMO.

Now, if they would lick the battery life issue, and make standard ones that have a more durable screen, then they might have something. But until then, I don't think they will catch on.
rlauzon is offline   Reply With Quote