View Single Post
Old 08-23-2013, 08:55 AM   #12
crich70
Grand Sorcerer
crich70 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.crich70 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.crich70 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.crich70 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.crich70 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.crich70 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.crich70 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.crich70 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.crich70 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.crich70 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.crich70 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
crich70's Avatar
 
Posts: 11,310
Karma: 43993832
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Monroe Wisconsin
Device: K3, Kindle Paperwhite, Calibre, and Mobipocket for Pc (netbook)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Billi View Post
For me personally this is not so much a case of copyright infringement or not but simply of bad behaviour and impoliteness.

It really doesn't take so much efforts to write a letter/email to this french band beforehand and inform them that he used the song in a lecture and wants to put the lecture on Youtube and thus is asking for permission. There will be very very few copyright owners who would refuse such a request.
There are accepted 'fair use' guidelines for using a part of a song or when quoting from a book by another person. As long as the person using the material stays within that % of the whole then it's generally accepted that no such letter/email is needed. For example I could have a character in a book sing part of the 1st line of "Battle Hymn of the Republic" without having to worry (assuming it is/was still in copyright) about having to get permission first. If I was putting together a book of Hymn's on the other hand I'd have to make sure that each separate hymn was either out of copyright or that I had permission to use them because I would be printing up copies of the entire hymn. To me it smacks of more impoliteness to issue a take down order of something when it is within the standards of free use. If someone writes a 100 line poem and someone else quotes 5 lines of that poem in a youtube video it isn't copyright infringement. It's fair use since 5 lines would be only 5% (I'm not sure what the limit is on amount, though shorter seems to be better). 2k words out of a 10k article wouldn't be fair use (20%), but 2k words out of a 500,000 word work would probably be ok as it would be such a small amount (.4%)

The factors use to determine such are as follows:
Quote:

The purpose and character of the use, including whether such use is of commercial nature or is for nonprofit educational purposes
Well the Prof. use was as part of a lecture.
The nature of the copyrighted work
It was a song in this case
The amount and substantiality of the portion used in relation to the copyrighted work as a whole
I haven't seen the video and don't know how long the song is but if it's a long song and he just used 1 or 2 lines he should be in the clear.
The effect of the use upon the potential market for, or value of, the copyrighted work
If he just quoted a small bit it might actually lead someone to want to seek out a copy of the complete song I would think.
crich70 is offline   Reply With Quote