View Single Post
Old 08-21-2013, 12:52 PM   #76
HarryT
eBook Enthusiast
HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
HarryT's Avatar
 
Posts: 85,557
Karma: 93980341
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: UK
Device: Kindle Oasis 2, iPad Pro 10.5", iPhone 6
Quote:
Originally Posted by OtterBooks View Post
Copyright infringement is not about what you take, it's about what you make. The problem with basing compensation on sale value, at least in the context of an illicit download, is that the infringement is not wrongful appropriation of quantifiable property.
It's not a matter of what the owner has lost, but of what you have gained.

If you ride on a bus without paying the fare, or you sneak into the cinema and watch a film without buying a ticket, you could argue that the bus operator or the cinema owner hasn't "lost" anything as a consequence, but it's clear that you have gained something - a trip on the bus, or watching the film - and that something has a definite value. The only meaningful way to assign a value is to base it on what a legitimate purchaser would have paid for that same product or service.
HarryT is offline   Reply With Quote