View Single Post
Old 08-21-2013, 06:30 AM   #62
MikeB1972
Gnu
MikeB1972 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.MikeB1972 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.MikeB1972 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.MikeB1972 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.MikeB1972 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.MikeB1972 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.MikeB1972 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.MikeB1972 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.MikeB1972 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.MikeB1972 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.MikeB1972 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Posts: 1,222
Karma: 15625359
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: UK
Device: BeBook,JetBook Lite,PRS-300-350-505-650,+ran out of space to type
Fines for criminal cases are normally based on a combination of how serious the crime and the offenders ability to pay, not a fixed amount, you wouldn't get a different sentence for B&E if you stole a 50" HD TV or a 17" Portable.

I can't see any reason why civil cases shouldn't be worked the same way instead of a multiple of the retail value of the goods. Many book torrents, I believe, are x thousand books, so if someone downloads a 20,000 book torrent it is unreasonable to fine someone £1 million (20,000 books x £5 per book x 10 for penalty) as pretty much no one will be able to pay the fine anyway. For 1 book charge them £50, no problem, but when it is silly amounts, take away the stuff they downloaded, and have a maximum fine as some % of their annual income.
MikeB1972 is offline   Reply With Quote