View Single Post
Old 08-17-2013, 06:46 PM   #9
SteveEisenberg
Grand Sorcerer
SteveEisenberg ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.SteveEisenberg ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.SteveEisenberg ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.SteveEisenberg ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.SteveEisenberg ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.SteveEisenberg ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.SteveEisenberg ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.SteveEisenberg ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.SteveEisenberg ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.SteveEisenberg ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.SteveEisenberg ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Posts: 7,424
Karma: 43514536
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: near Philadelphia USA
Device: Kindle Kids Edition, Fire HD 10 (11th generation)
Quote:
Originally Posted by corroonb View Post
What exactly is the point of the safe harbour provisions of the DMCA?
This was a German ruling based on European law. DMCA is American.

Quote:
Also when will we start to see content owners prosecuted for perjury when they submitted frivolous DMCA takedowns? Never because the law and the legal system is systemically corrupt.
Here is a description of those frivolous requests:

http://torrentfreak.com/google-start...quests-121213/

It sound to me like the requests are mistakes, not deliberate. Given the enormous volume of takedown requests, some of it must be automated, and so could be the result of a software bug.

By contrast, I think the people who are illegally uploading and downloading copyrighted materials are more likely to be doing so deliberately. So why not prosecute them first?

Do I mean that seriously? No. But just like I don't want to ruin the lives of college student downloaders, I don't want to ruin the lives of people working at Warner Brothers or Penguin Random House. This should be a civil matter.

Last edited by SteveEisenberg; 08-17-2013 at 06:53 PM.
SteveEisenberg is offline   Reply With Quote