Quote:
Originally Posted by Purple Lady
I just encountered something that confused me at first. I was in a series grouping and changed the sorting to be by series. I then sorted by date(calibre). It ended up sorting by date(calibre) descending. I think this was because I had previously sorted by date(calibre) and when I choose the same sort a second time it switches it. I would have expected this if I hit the same sort choice twice in a row, but didn't expect it to switch if there was a different sort chosen in between.
It does the same thing in the current version on my phone. So do I count as one of the 50% of phone users since I have it on both phone and tablet?
|
Re phone users: yes. We can get statistics of installed devices. That statistic doesn't take into consideration who owns the device or how many devices a user owns.
I should also point out that the statistic really looks more like 35% are tablets, with 22% being original N7s. We don't know what is buried in the 50% "Other", so I made the arbitrary assumption that almost half of the "other" were tablets. I am probably wildly overstating the case, but who knows?
The statistics we can see are:
Code:
Google Nexus 7 (grouper) 21.64%
Samsung Galaxy Tab II 7.0 (espressowifi) 3.80%
Samsung Galaxy Tab II 10.1 (espresso10wifi) 3.59%
Samsung Galaxy S III (m0) 2.91%
Google Nexus 4 (mako) 2.32%
Google Nexus 10 (manta) 2.07%
Asus TF700T (TF700T) 2.02%
Barnes and Noble NOOKŪ HD+ (ovation) 2.02%
Samsung Galaxy S II (GT-I9100) 1.84%
Others 57.79%
Re the sort: I don't see unexpected behavior. For example, I sort by title, see title ascending (expected) then I group by series. I see the series by title. I then sort by date(calibre) I see the books in descending date order, expected because all the dates sort descending by default. I then sort by series, and see the books in ascending series index order. I then sort by date(calibre) and I see the list again in descending date order. With these steps do you see something different?