Quote:
Originally Posted by Kaitou Ace
Which doesn't say that...
Edit: I am not actually being facetious. You can read the entire filing from google here. The bits in question start on page 28. It's just a page or so of text, and is not in legalese either, it's very simple reading. |
Yes, it is very simple reading. Google clearly quotes the Smith v. Maryland case: “a person has no legitimate expectation of privacy in information he voluntarily turns over to third parties.” Google being the third party they feel that the information is being voluntarily turned over to them by the non-gmail users.