View Single Post
Old 08-14-2013, 06:43 PM   #63
manfred63
Connoisseur
manfred63 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.manfred63 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.manfred63 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.manfred63 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.manfred63 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.manfred63 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.manfred63 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.manfred63 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.manfred63 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.manfred63 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.manfred63 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
manfred63's Avatar
 
Posts: 67
Karma: 1175224
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Chemnitz, Germany
Device: Kobo Glo
I'm sure it won't. Pay-per-view is the last thing people need and want.

A paper is a daily composition of different articles arround different topics. Arts, sports, politics, fun and leisure and so fourth. That's one reason among others why subscribers like their papers.

If you want to pay per article you'd reduce a newspaper to a news agency which is something completely different. I understand that you don't want to read all articles. Well, nobody does and nobody reads all articles of a newspaper. But it's good that you have the choice to read them or not once you paid your one or two bucks or whatever the WP or NYT costs where you live.
manfred63 is offline   Reply With Quote