Quote:
Originally Posted by pwalker8
|
So? The judge had spent weeks going over the pretrial motions and Apple's pretrial memorandum of law and the DOJ response and a lot of the evidence provided in discovery. If Apple's arguments were not compelling, and the additional evidence they provided during the trial didn't affect the outcome of the decision, would you really expect her to ignore all the work she had done leading up to the trial? This is not the same as a jury trial where the jury has no clue about the facts of the case until it's presented by the plaintiff and defendant.