Thread: DOJ publishes terms for settlement in Apple antitrust case
View Single Post
Old 08-10-2013, 08:08 AM   #45
fjtorres
Grand Sorcerer
fjtorres ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.fjtorres ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.fjtorres ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.fjtorres ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.fjtorres ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.fjtorres ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.fjtorres ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.fjtorres ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.fjtorres ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.fjtorres ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.fjtorres ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Posts: 11,732
Karma: 128354696
Join Date: May 2009
Location: 26 kly from Sgr A*
Device: T100TA,PW2,PRS-T1,KT,FireHD 8.9,K2, PB360,BeBook One,Axim51v,TC1000
Quote:
Originally Posted by Barcey View Post
Hmmm this doesn't sound good.

http://news.cnet.com/8301-1023_3-575...ook-practices/



Why does she believe they'll have a "vigorous in-house pro-competition program" when they still don't believe they've done anything wrong.

I think the following is better then the 5 years but I think the interval should be longer then 6 to 8 months. They've already telegraphed they're going to collude again.
The overlapping contract performance windows are already in place as part of the publishers' settlement terms. They are not a new, relaxed proposal, but rather what is in place for the publishers.
fjtorres is offline   Reply With Quote