View Single Post
Old 08-08-2013, 03:54 PM   #84
tompe
Grand Sorcerer
tompe ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.tompe ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.tompe ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.tompe ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.tompe ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.tompe ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.tompe ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.tompe ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.tompe ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.tompe ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.tompe ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Posts: 7,452
Karma: 7185064
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Linköpng, Sweden
Device: Kindle Voyage, Nexus 5, Kindle PW
Quote:
Originally Posted by Elfwreck View Post
Because businesses aren't allowed to say "I don't need to provide accessibility features; someone else is already doing that." Stores aren't allowed to say "my store doesn't have wheelchair access, but it's okay; those customers can shop next door." Not even if "next door" is owned by the same company.
Well, but why not if this give you the best solution? Suppose you have a mark to put on product that satisfy some requierements for access and you get some money (from the state) to produce it and customers that need these products get them payed for by the state. Would a system in that direction not be more efficient?
tompe is offline   Reply With Quote