View Single Post
Old 08-07-2013, 01:30 AM   #50
Prestidigitweeze
Fledgling Demagogue
Prestidigitweeze ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Prestidigitweeze ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Prestidigitweeze ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Prestidigitweeze ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Prestidigitweeze ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Prestidigitweeze ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Prestidigitweeze ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Prestidigitweeze ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Prestidigitweeze ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Prestidigitweeze ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Prestidigitweeze ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Prestidigitweeze's Avatar
 
Posts: 2,384
Karma: 31132263
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: White Plains
Device: Clara HD; Oasis 2; Aura HD; iPad Air; PRS-350; Galaxy S7.
Quote:
Originally Posted by tubemonkey View Post
There is, but screen resolution is still 169 ppi. That resolution is several generations old and it's utter nonsense that Samsung is still using it.
I've often thought there had to be a reason for Samsung's resolution-crippling strategy and that it might involve (i) an agreement with companies for which Samsung manufactures better tablet screens or (ii) an antiquated approach to model stratification. Some people might not buy iPads if Samsung made a less crippled version under their own name, some might forgo high-end smartphones if they could own similarly spec'd tablets, and some might once have settled for lower screen resolutions if the other specs were good enough.

Luckily, we're not living in those days any more and Samsung has to have noticed.

Last edited by Prestidigitweeze; 08-07-2013 at 01:33 AM.
Prestidigitweeze is offline   Reply With Quote