http://apps.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/view?id=7520931307
Quote:
|
These devices often include browsers, but the browser is incidental to, and designed to enable or enhance, the primary purpose of the device -- accessing text-based digital works.
|
Perhaps this explains why Amazon absurdly calls their eInk browser (and, when provided, music-playing feature), experimental. Maybe the lawyers said that if they called it experimental, they could more easily claim, in court, that something else was the primary purpose of the device.
The primary purpose of the device is up to the user, not the manufacturer.
P.S. Am I part of the experiment? If so, what institutional review board approved it? If none, can I sue?