View Single Post
Old 08-05-2013, 04:17 PM   #27
graycyn
Wizard
graycyn ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.graycyn ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.graycyn ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.graycyn ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.graycyn ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.graycyn ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.graycyn ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.graycyn ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.graycyn ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.graycyn ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.graycyn ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Posts: 1,591
Karma: 11722446
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: NE Oregon
Device: Kobo Sage, Pocketbook Era, Kobo Forma, Kindle Oasis 2
Quote:
Originally Posted by HarryT View Post
The fact that you can "read for hours" on an eInk device, however, suggests that pixel density is not a significant factor. A 6" 600x800 pixel eInk reader has a pixel density of 167ppi, which is considerably lower than that of many LCD tablets.
I notice the poor pixel density, hence preferring the 200ppi on the Sony 350 and hence getting an Aura right after they were announced.

However, the reason poor density on e-ink is readable vs. poor pixel density on a tablet is that you don't have light shining THROUGH the pixels, making the text look far worse.

For instance, I can scan an illustration in a book, put that on e-ink and it will look passable on that gray background. On a tablet, the white back light shining through will point out absolutely every single spot where the printed ink in the paper book was worn by handling or where it didn't receive a good solid imprint in the first place, often with an atrocious looking result.
graycyn is offline   Reply With Quote