View Single Post
Old 08-03-2013, 12:58 PM   #28
holymadness
Guru
holymadness ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.holymadness ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.holymadness ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.holymadness ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.holymadness ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.holymadness ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.holymadness ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.holymadness ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.holymadness ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.holymadness ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.holymadness ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
holymadness's Avatar
 
Posts: 722
Karma: 2084955
Join Date: Dec 2010
Device: iPhone
Quote:
Originally Posted by Graham View Post
Hang on, I don't buy into the idea that political lobbying 'bought' Judge Cote's ruling, but it's not as if Apple don't lobby at all. They just do it less than their competitors, and analysts estimate that they've doubled the amount spent this year:

http://allthingsd.com/20130524/apple...into-lobbying/

So, they are 'playing the game'.

Graham
Agreed on all counts.

Again, my issue is with the hypocrisy of the article and the individual who posted it. They suggest that Apple should have more rigorously engaged in unethical behaviour to avoid their fate (implying that they deserved it—what hubris), yet had the ruling gone the other way we'd be reading an article about how nefarious Apple engaged in corporate bribery to get its way.

There is no winning scenario. There is just blind hatred. Any excuse will suffice to criticize.
holymadness is offline   Reply With Quote