View Single Post
Old 08-02-2013, 05:12 PM   #13
BWinmill
Nameless Being
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by AHMavrick View Post
Frankly I can see some university profs going this route if they can work out getting the royalties they enjoy form teaching from the textbooks they author. It was my experience back in the old old days before even pagers were invented and handheld calculators went for $100 or more that profs made a lot of their money publishing. Making frequent, or specifically annual, re-writes got them guaranteed royalties on their mandated text books.
I studied and worked in universities for over a decade, and only ran into this sort of thing a handful of times: twice for books written by the prof, once for a book translated by the prof, once for a book written by another faculty member. There were also locally produced lab manuals, but the prices were always in line with reproduction costs. Of the two books written by the course instructor, one was into it for the money and he unkindly called me a country lawyer when I discovered that it cost money to take quizzes (which was against university policy) and the prof was a founder of the company that offered those quizzes (clear conflict of interest). The other instructor was okay with students photocopying the relevant sections of his book. Beyond that, I found that very few profs actually expected students to buy the textbook after first year. Even profs for first year courses rarely expected students to have the current edition (and the main reason why they expected students to have the textbook in first year courses was to reduce the demand created by students for additional help due to large class sizes). On top of that, I'm not convinced that upper year textbooks are all that profitable due to the low demand.

There's a lot wrong with the textbook publishing industry, but I'm afraid that some of the most common conspiracy theories just don't hold water.
  Reply With Quote