View Single Post
Old 07-31-2013, 04:52 PM   #40
morriss003
Evangelist
morriss003 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.morriss003 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.morriss003 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.morriss003 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.morriss003 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.morriss003 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.morriss003 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.morriss003 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.morriss003 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.morriss003 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.morriss003 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
morriss003's Avatar
 
Posts: 438
Karma: 3409790
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Maui
Device: kindle
Quote:
Originally Posted by HarryT View Post
Definitely. Hobbit first, then LOTR. Neither The Hobbit nor LOTR are "trilogies"; TH is a rather slim volume; LOTR is a single novel sometimes published in three volumes for practical reasons, but it tells you itself in its introductory notes that it's not a trilogy.
Thank you, thank you, thank you. I get so tired of LOTR being referred to as a trilogy.
morriss003 is offline   Reply With Quote