View Single Post
Old 07-31-2013, 04:39 AM   #14
Lynx-lynx
Treachery of images ...
Lynx-lynx ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Lynx-lynx ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Lynx-lynx ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Lynx-lynx ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Lynx-lynx ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Lynx-lynx ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Lynx-lynx ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Lynx-lynx ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Lynx-lynx ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Lynx-lynx ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Lynx-lynx ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Lynx-lynx's Avatar
 
Posts: 4,123
Karma: 93720365
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Australia
Device: Sony 650, Kobo Glo, H2O, Aura One, Forma, Libra 2, Libra Colour
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rbneader View Post
Hm. On one hand, nice to see a judiciary talking about fair use and consumer rights.

On the other hand, I know for a fact that at least one video game company who *tried* to distribute their game world-wide was taken to court and forced to track people's IP, partially because of content restrictions. If Australia wants to have a legally-enforceable content rating system, that's imposing extra costs on companies and those costs will be passed on (that's just how companies roll).
Let the Aus gov't put the ratings on, prior to the release of the whatever ... all the company has to do is to give the Aus gov't the whatever in softcopy, Aus gov't then rates it, then tells the maker the rating standard and it's included on the whatever packaging.

Yep - it could cost an extra .01cent eh
Lynx-lynx is offline   Reply With Quote