View Single Post
Old 07-28-2013, 02:30 PM   #760
Blossom
Treasure Seeker
Blossom ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Blossom ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Blossom ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Blossom ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Blossom ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Blossom ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Blossom ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Blossom ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Blossom ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Blossom ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Blossom ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Blossom's Avatar
 
Posts: 18,708
Karma: 26026435
Join Date: Mar 2010
Device: Kobo HD Glo, Kindles, Kindle Fires, Andriod Devices
Quote:
Originally Posted by Critteranne View Post
It might be a review of the original printing. While PW didn't review as many romances in 1974, they would have reviewed the big names -- Woodiwiss, Rogers, Lindsey, etc. (And their earlier romance reviews were often a tad more obnoxious in tone, like this one. )

Besides, if Publishers Weekly can't figure out how to read a copyright date, then I give up.
Nope it was reviewed in 2009 by them. Here's the link

Pretty funny if you ask me.
Blossom is offline   Reply With Quote