View Single Post
Old 07-28-2013, 10:56 AM   #178
auspex
Addict
auspex ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.auspex ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.auspex ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.auspex ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.auspex ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.auspex ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.auspex ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.auspex ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.auspex ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.auspex ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.auspex ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
auspex's Avatar
 
Posts: 201
Karma: 1071756
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Nova Scotia
Device: Kobo Aura, Nexus 5x
Quote:
Originally Posted by Andrew H. View Post
If it's selected properly, it is enough for a good sampling. I have no idea if it was selected properly, although these are actual professional pollers.

None of these points matter for their poll, which was designed *only* to see what Americans in general thought of e-books vs. paper books. An experienced e-reader is still only one individual.
The "location" question matters. Unless they sample a broad range of American locales, they can't find "what Americans … thought". But sure, 1,000 is enough, and given that the professional pollsters have prepared methods for selecting good random samples from "America", or any smaller geographic area, I have no reason to doubt the sample is sufficient to get a good answer — as long as they ask good questions.
auspex is offline   Reply With Quote