View Single Post
Old 07-28-2013, 06:27 AM   #755
Critteranne
Guru
Critteranne ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Critteranne ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Critteranne ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Critteranne ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Critteranne ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Critteranne ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Critteranne ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Critteranne ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Critteranne ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Critteranne ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Critteranne ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Critteranne's Avatar
 
Posts: 810
Karma: 23183490
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: MD
Device: Kindle, iPad
Quote:
Originally Posted by Blossom View Post
Oh I just realized PW's thought this was a new romance! Just FYI this was written in 1974 and is a re-release. Oh the shock that PW's must have had thinking someone would actually write something like this today!
It might be a review of the original printing. While PW didn't review as many romances in 1974, they would have reviewed the big names -- Woodiwiss, Rogers, Lindsey, etc. (And their earlier romance reviews were often a tad more obnoxious in tone, like this one. )

Besides, if Publishers Weekly can't figure out how to read a copyright date, then I give up.
Critteranne is offline   Reply With Quote