View Single Post
Old 09-23-2008, 10:30 AM   #53
nekokami
fruminous edugeek
nekokami ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.nekokami ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.nekokami ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.nekokami ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.nekokami ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.nekokami ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.nekokami ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.nekokami ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.nekokami ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.nekokami ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.nekokami ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
nekokami's Avatar
 
Posts: 6,745
Karma: 551260
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Northeast US
Device: iPad, eBw 1150
Quote:
Originally Posted by HarryT View Post
I don't agree with you in saying that a new work should make a conscious attempt to immitate the writing style of the original author. To my mind, telling a good story set in the "world" created by the original author is sufficient. Better (IMHO) for a good author to write in his own style, rather than make an attempt to immitate someone else - an attempt which is probably doomed to failure.
I think Tirsales has made a good point. If the book is marketed as "a new book set in the Hitchhiker's Universe" I would agree with you; it would be better for Colfer to write in his own style. Hopefully that is the approach that will be taken, rather than setting expectations that this book will be a "sequel" to the others. That's why I hope Colfer will choose different main characters. If he writes about Arthur Dent, comparisons will be unavoidable. If, however, he chooses (for example) to write about Dent's child(ren), he would have considerably more leeway to express his own writing style
nekokami is offline   Reply With Quote