View Single Post
Old 07-23-2013, 11:06 AM   #64
Lemurion
eReader
Lemurion ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Lemurion ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Lemurion ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Lemurion ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Lemurion ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Lemurion ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Lemurion ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Lemurion ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Lemurion ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Lemurion ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Lemurion ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Lemurion's Avatar
 
Posts: 2,750
Karma: 4968470
Join Date: Aug 2007
Device: Note 5; PW3; Nook HD+; ChuWi Hi12; iPad
Quote:
Originally Posted by Catlady View Post
Because there isn't enough factual information to legitimately question the poll--no one's reported going past the paywall for the complete results and methodology.
Quote:
Originally Posted by DiapDealer View Post
That's fine. I have no problem with that. Just don't take the knee-kerk stance that doubting the validity of the poll automatically translates to being "threatened by the results."
I don't feel "threatened," because I don't think these numbers really mean anything anyway.

As for questioning the poll, I will admit that I immediately had questions; not because of the results, but because of the source. I've read a number of articles over the last few years which have discussed how poll questions can be tailored towards a desired result, most of which have referenced Rasmussen as an example of a polling group which uses these tactics. As a result, I don't have a lot of faith in the validity of any of their polls.
Lemurion is offline   Reply With Quote