View Single Post
Old 07-17-2013, 05:23 PM   #12
speakingtohe
Wizard
speakingtohe ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.speakingtohe ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.speakingtohe ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.speakingtohe ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.speakingtohe ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.speakingtohe ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.speakingtohe ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.speakingtohe ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.speakingtohe ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.speakingtohe ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.speakingtohe ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Posts: 4,812
Karma: 26912940
Join Date: Apr 2010
Device: sony PRS-T1 and T3, Kobo Mini and Aura HD, Tablet
Quote:
Originally Posted by fjtorres View Post

Dahlgren is the only acclaimed SF novel I ever started and failed to finish.
Or even get halfway...

Different tastes I suppose.
Interestingly, I've never had any interest in any to do with Hubbard.
I remember liking Hubbard when I was very young and thought Heinlein was the cat's ass when I was 12 or 13 but then thought that Asimov's laws of robotics were sensible at that time. At around 18 I found Hubbard trite and boring and was firmly in favour of a robot uprising, and I won't say what I thought of Lazarus Long and the horse he rode in on. And poor old L. Ron is still controlling a hell of a lot of simple folk (from the grave one assumes).

Still these books are enduring the test of time for many. Maybe I liked Dhalgren because I had just bought a motorcycle, but probably because I am a sucker for the lone hero/anti-hero character. I actually liked escape from New York (the movie) and I am sure I am in a minority group there.



Helen
speakingtohe is offline   Reply With Quote