Quote:
Originally Posted by leebase
The very fact the the publishers HATED Amazon's pricing but were POWERLESS to do anything about it is proof positive that Amazon had monopoly power.
It is apparent that the publishers did collude though I agree with Apple that Apple did not. The judge decided that Apple is guilty because Apple's actions allowed the publishers colluding to succeed.
|
Your opinion is defensible only if you refuse to believe that Apple's actions included acting as a go-between to enable the collusion. However, the overwhelming evidence from the timing of phone calls and emails is that Apple was indeed orchestrating this.
Leebase, have you read the 160 pages of reasoned argument presented by Judge Cote?
It would help if you singled out exactly what parts of her argument you disagree with.
Graham