View Single Post
Old 07-10-2013, 09:07 AM   #16
kovidgoyal
creator of calibre
kovidgoyal ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.kovidgoyal ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.kovidgoyal ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.kovidgoyal ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.kovidgoyal ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.kovidgoyal ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.kovidgoyal ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.kovidgoyal ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.kovidgoyal ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.kovidgoyal ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.kovidgoyal ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
kovidgoyal's Avatar
 
Posts: 45,190
Karma: 27110894
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Mumbai, India
Device: Various
You've gotta live with it. When many records have changed, resorting makes sense. You should be able to reduce the sort overhead by using a virtual library, though off hand I can't recall if the current database code restricts to the VL when sorting or not, I know the new db code does.
kovidgoyal is offline   Reply With Quote